Decentralizing Academic Projects: Fair Rewards for Students and Lecturers

Decentralizing Academic Projects: Fair Rewards for Students and Lecturers

In today’s academic landscape, students and researchers face numerous challenges related to project ownership, fair recognition, and plagiarism prevention.

Traditional systems often fail to adequately protect intellectual property, leading to disputes over authorship and insufficient acknowledgement of student contributions.

This is a common problem across universities in Nigeria and other Countries worldwide. This article explores the problem and how a decentralized solution can solve it.

The Problem: Kamil’s Story

Kamil is an engineering student who recently graduated from university after five years of rigorous study. His final-year academic project was a criterion for his graduation and certification. Kamil invested sleepless nights, personal resources, and funds to complete his project. However, the outcome was just grades.

  • Kamil received only grades for his project, with no additional recognition.

  • His supervisor published the project on a research platform, where he earns without giving Kamil any credits.

  • The lecturer gained recognition and access to global opportunities, while Kamil, who initiated and developed the project from scratch, was left with no opportunities or ownership of his work.

Kamil’s story exemplifies the broader issues plaguing the current academic project system:

  • Lack of student ownership over their work

  • Insufficient recognition of student contributions

  • Unfair authorship claims by supervisors

  • High costs associated with publishing research on a traditional platform

  • Inadequate Monetization

  • Inadequate plagiarism detection mechanisms

These challenges are not isolated incidents but systemic issues in the academic system, and they are common in Nigerian and global universities.

  • According to a study published in research integrity journal, researchers have experienced disputes over authorship, and it is increasing. Other publications like Research Gate have also discussed this problem.

  • According to Springer Nature research, Article processing charges vary from journal to journal but cost an of average 2,551 USD, and can reach as high as 5000 USD creating significant barriers to disseminating research.

The Need for a Decentralized Solution

Kamil’s experience highlights the need for a more transparent, fair, and decentralized approach to academic projects. Blockchain technology offers a promising solution to these longstanding issues by providing:

  1. Immutable ownership records

  2. Transparent contribution tracking

  3. Smart contract-based attribution

  4. Tokenization of academic work

  5. Enhanced plagiarism detection

Implementing a blockchain-based system for academic projects, we can create an environment where students like Kamil receive fair recognition for their work, maintain ownership of their intellectual property, and have opportunities to benefit from their research beyond grades and certification.

The Solution

The blockchain-based system introduces various mechanisms to ensure equitable rewards for students and lecturers. One such mechanism is the use of Project Tokens, which represent unique tokens for each academic project and are distributed among contributors based on their level of involvement.

The second mechanism uses Smart Contract-Based Incentives to facilitate the automatic allocation of rewards according to predefined criteria and individual contributions.

Implementing Reputation Systems further enhances this framework by rewarding high-quality contributions to research and peer review. Moreover, Decentralized Funding Models emerge through tokenization, allowing for innovative funding approaches like decentralized research grants or crowdfunding for promising projects.

In addition to promoting fair rewards, the blockchain-based system provides robust tools for enhancing academic integrity. It ensures Immutable Record Keeping, where all versions of a work are documented, creating an auditable development trail. The system also supports Transparent Peer Review, enabling the entire process to be conducted on-chain, which generates a verifiable record that can help reduce bias.

Furthermore, Automated Plagiarism Checks can be implemented through smart contracts, streamlining the process of verifying new submissions against existing records on the blockchain.

Lastly, the system will facilitate Proper Citation Recognition, ensuring that citations and references are accurately identified and verified. Together, these features contribute to a more transparent and accountable academic system.

Bringing Academic On-chain

Academic projects are just one aspect of educational activities we can bring on-chain. Implementing blockchain technology in academic projects doesn’t just solve existing problems; it also serves as a gateway to introducing students, researchers, and institutions to the world of blockchain. This transition to on-chain interactions has far-reaching implications for the future of academics and beyond.

One significant aspect of this concept is the establishment of on-chain project portfolios. Students can register their projects on the blockchain, creating a verifiable portfolio that potential employers or collaborators can easily access. This feature showcases their academic achievements and enhances their employability in a competitive job market.

Blockchain facilitates the creation of decentralized data repositories for research and collaboration. O’Brien explained that a handful of educational institutions have begun using decentralized data storage models to preserve data sets. Institutions like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Harvard University, and the University of California use Filecoin to store large data sets, fostering collaboration across institutions.

Additionally, collaborative research networks enabled by blockchain technology ensure secure and transparent sharing of data and findings among researchers, further promoting interdisciplinary cooperation.

Open-access platforms that utilize blockchain are also transforming the publishing landscape. These platforms unite authors, reviewers, and readers in a decentralized manner, fundamentally changing how academic knowledge is disseminated. Moreover, systems that incentivize peer review by rewarding reviewers with tokens create an on-chain economy that encourages participation and enhances the quality of academic contributions.

Lastly, blockchain technology plays a vital role in plagiarism prevention and content originality. Allowing students and educators to submit their work on-chain for verification establishes a robust decentralized system that safeguards against academic dishonesty. This innovative approach not only protects intellectual property but also fosters a culture of integrity within the academic system.

Key Features of a Blockchain-Based Academic System

1. Project Registration and Ownership: Students can register their projects on the blockchain, establishing clear, timestamped ownership.

2. Transparent Contribution Tracking: All contributions from students, supervisors, and collaborators are recorded on-chain, ensuring fair attribution and reducing authorship disputes.

3. Smart Contract Attribution: Authorship and credit are automatically assigned based on recorded contributions, minimizing conflicts over recognition.

4. Tokenization of Academic Work: Each piece of academic content could be represented as a non-fungible token (NFT) on the blockchain. This would allow creators to maintain ownership and control over their work while providing a permanent record of authorship

5. Decentralized Publishing: Research can be published on the platform without payment. This system can mimic platforms like paragraph and mirror, democratizing access to academic publishing.

Challenges and Considerations

While the potential benefits are significant, implementing such a system comes with challenges:

1. Scalability: Handling the volume of academic data on current blockchain systems could be challenging.

2. Adoption Hurdles: Convincing traditional academic institutions to embrace such radical change may be difficult.

3. Privacy Concerns: Balancing transparency with necessary privacy for ongoing research projects is crucial.

4. Governance Issues: Establishing rules for a decentralized academic ecosystem across institutions will be complex.

5. Technical Implementation: Developing robust mechanisms for verifying contributions and integrating with existing academic systems will require significant effort.

Conclusion

Decentralizing academic projects through blockchain technology offers a promising solution to longstanding academic issues. This approach ensures fair recognition, protects intellectual property, and streamlines academic processes. It has the potential to revolutionize how we conduct, share, and recognize academic work.

As technology matures and gains acceptance, academic institutions, technology developers, and policymakers must collaborate in developing standards and best practices for these on-chain academic systems. By doing so, we can create a more equitable, transparent, and innovative educational environment that benefits students, researchers, and the broader scientific community.